> On Jul 7, 7:17 am, François Rose <fr.r...@free.fr> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 4, 2:18 pm, r...@my-deja.com wrote:
> > <snip>
>
> > > Although this summary says "resveratrol did not prolong life in mice
> > > fed a standard calorie diet. ", two points are worth noting. 1)
> > > resveratrol plus CR in the form of every-other-day (EOD) feeding DID
> > > extend lifespan by 15%, and 2) the strain of mice used in this study
> > > have previously been shown to not respond to either EOD or 40% caloric
> > > restriction.
>
> > > One cannot draw definite conclusions as to what exactly resveratrol
> > > will do in other species of mice, much less in human beings, from this
> > > study. It does seem likely to be beneficial.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > I can't find where you get your 15%.
> > I only get this from the given link:http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080703120402.htm
> > "Mice on a high-calorie diet without resveratrol lived the shortest
> > length of time and mice on an every-other-day regimen lived the
> > longest, regardless of resveratrol treatment."
> > I can't find either the name of the strain.
>
> > If anyone has access to the data of the different groups, I would be
> > interested
>
> > François Rose
> > PS to rs1000: just curious, when you wrote "So they published it
> > afterall....
> > did you mean that the authors were possibly a bit reluctant to publish
> > these results (because the resveratrol life extending effect was not
> > seen in normal diet and CR diet animals)?
>
> You have to read the paper. not the summary from the press release.
> Pearson et al., Resveratrol Delays Age-Related Deterioration and
> Mimics Transcriptional Aspects of Dietary
> Restriction without Extending Life Span, Cell Metabolism (2008), doi:
> 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.06.011
>
> www.cellmetabolism.org- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I now know where you get your 15%.
rjk3@my-deja.c…
ironjustice
